CST Week 3

 Project 1 review

  • Summarize the feedback you received about your code from your peers
        Code functions and is commented well.
        
  • Identify any trends you noticed when evaluating the code of others
        We all had a pretty smooth time working on the project. Instructions were very clear and easy to understand.

  • Was any part of the code a struggle for YOU?
        No sections caused any struggle.

  • Was any part of writing the code easy for YOU?
        Not necessarily the easiest, but I enjoyed writing the attackModifier() method.

  • What is your biggest victory?
        Staying on top of commenting and keeping comments insightful.
        
  • Who did you work with?
        My teammates; Brandon, Tim, and Lex

  • What improvements would you make to your code/what was suggested?
        Make the attackModifier() method more condensed. I believe while it could be condensed, the way its written makes it easily readable and allows it to be expanded on very easily.

  • Which unit tests were the hardest to pass?
        None. Once everything was built the tests passed without issue.

  • How do the existing tests function and could they be improved?
        There could be an additional test for the takeDamage() method.

  • What did one of your teammates struggle with?
        When to use getter and setter methods.

  • What are you most proud of on your submission for Project 1?
        Building a program that could be easily expanded into a fun little game!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CST300 Week 2: Drafts and Peer Reviews

Week 4

CST334 Week 2